金剛般若波羅蜜經註解 1.94

1.94

此結上文而證勸也。不應取法者，空能觀之智也；不應取非法者，空所觀之境也。論云：「法有性相尚不應取，何況非法本無性相？」又云：「善如法尚不取，況不善非法？」疏云：「今言法者，說五陰空為法，五陰相為非法，即以陰空為藥名法陰，有為病名非法。陰病既除，空藥亦遣，非法既謝，在法亦亡。」與論意正相㳷合。

This concludes the above text and provides verification and exhortation. Not grasping at dharmas empties the wisdom that can contemplate; not grasping at non-dharmas empties the object that is contemplated. The treatise says: 'Dharmas having nature and marks should not even be grasped, how much less non-dharmas that fundamentally lack nature and marks?' It also says: 'Even good that accords with Dharma is not grasped, how much less unwholesome non-dharmas?' The commentary says: 'Speaking of dharmas now, stating that the five aggregates are empty is Dharma, while the marks of the five aggregates are non-Dharma. Thus taking the emptiness of the aggregates as medicine is named Dharma-aggregates, and taking existence as disease is named non-Dharma. Once the disease of the aggregates is eliminated, the medicine of emptiness is also dismissed; once non-Dharma has ceased, being in Dharma is also lost.' This corresponds exactly with the treatise's meaning.