仁王經疏 1.238

1.238

釋曰：第二、所化生空。謂五蘊上計我以為眾生、我及人等，情有理無，故說為空。或於蘊上計我為常樂我淨，或於蘊上如其所應計識蘊為智者，色蘊一分眼為見者，行蘊一分命等為壽者，亦是情有理無，所執情故，說為生空。諸宗同異，如宗中說。

Explanation: Second, the person-emptiness of the transformed. This means that, based on the five aggregates, one imputes a self and takes it to be a sentient being, a self, a person, and so forth; these exist subjectively but are absent in principle, so they are spoken of as empty. Or, based on the aggregates, one imputes a self as permanent, blissful, self, and pure; or, based on the aggregates, one appropriately imputes the consciousness-aggregate as the knower, a portion of the form-aggregate (the eye) as the seer, and a portion of the formations-aggregate (vital life-force, etc.) as the living being; these too exist subjectively but are absent in principle, and because they are conceptually grasped, they are spoken of as the emptiness of persons. The agreements and differences among the various schools are as explained in their doctrines.