仁王經疏 1.250

1.250

釋曰：第二、辨觀。文別有二：初觀色陰、後類釋四陰。此即初也然釋此文，諸說不同。一《本記》云「不住色者，第一句遮色，色是色蘊，即質礙義。非色者，第二句遮四蘊，即了別心等。非非色者，第三句重遮色心。若具應言不住非色非非色，為存略故但言非非色。」此意釋云：能緣之智觀彼真如，離色、離非色，雙離色非色也。一云：言不住者，謂內證智不執著故，名為不住。如《攝大乘》，色有三種：一分別色，即是遍計所執。二種類色，是依他起。三法性色，是圓成實。由三無性，遣三性色，故言不住色，乃至不住非非色。一云：法性真如，離四句、絕百非。言不住色等者，若具應言不住色、不住非色、不住亦色亦非色、不住非色非非色，以存略故，除第三句及第四句中非色兩字。

Explanation: Second, discerning the contemplation. The text has two divisions: first, contemplating the form aggregate; second, explaining the four aggregates by analogy. This is the first. However, in explaining this text, various interpretations differ. The first, the *Original Record*, says: '"Does not abide in form": the first phrase negates form; form is the form-aggregate, meaning physical obstruction. "Non-form": the second phrase negates the four aggregates, namely the cognitive mind and so forth. "Not-non-form": the third phrase doubly negates form and mind. If fully expressed, it should say "does not abide in non-form and not-non-form"; for the sake of brevity, it only says "not-non-form".' The meaning of this explanation is: The cognitive wisdom that contemplates that tathatā is free from form, free from non-form, and doubly free from form and non-form. Another says: Stating 'does not abide' means that because internally realised wisdom does not cling, it is called 'not abiding'. As in the *Mahāyānasaṃgraha*, form has three kinds: 1. conceptualised form, which is the imaginal nature; 2. categorized form, which is the other-dependent nature; 3. form of the Dharmatā, which is the consummate nature. Due to the three naturelessnesses, the three forms of the three natures are dispelled; therefore it says 'does not abide in form' down to 'does not abide in not-non-form'. Another says: Tathatā of the Dharmatā is free from the four propositions and cuts off the hundred negations. Saying 'does not abide in form', etc.: if fully expressed, it should say 'does not abide in form, does not abide in non-form, does not abide in both form and non-form, and does not abide in neither form nor non-form'; for the sake of brevity, the third phrase and the two characters 'non-form' in the fourth phrase are omitted.