仁王經疏 1.270

1.270

釋曰：自下第二歷門辨空。於中有二：初歷門辨空、後「是法」下以生等相釋成空義。此即初也。謂非非法空，歷法差別，便成七空。七法空者，諸法實性，本性自空，不由智力，名法性空，通下六門。二者五蘊、三十二處、四十八界，此三科門，義如上說。五者六大，所謂四大及與空、識。六者四諦、七者十二緣生。此上七門，皆是非非法，故說名為空。

Exposition: Below, this is the second part: distinguishing emptiness through various categories. Within this there are two parts: first, distinguishing emptiness through various categories; and later, from “these dharmas” onward, explaining and establishing the meaning of emptiness by means of characteristics such as arising. This is the first. It means that when the emptiness of non-non-dharmas runs through the distinctions of dharmas, it constitutes seven kinds of emptiness. As for the emptiness of the seven dharmas: the real nature of all dharmas is fundamentally and naturally empty, not relying on the power of wisdom; this is called the emptiness of dharma-nature, which applies across the six categories below. The second is the five aggregates, the third is the twelve sense fields, and the fourth is the eighteen realms; the meaning of these three taxonomies is as explained above. The fifth is the six elements, namely the four great elements together with space and consciousness. The sixth is the four truths, and the seventh is the twelve links of dependent origination. These seven categories above are all non-non-dharmas; therefore, they are called empty.