仁王經疏 1.326

1.326

釋曰：第三、煩惱空。此有兩釋：一依《本記》，文有三節：初三界空者，三界中皮煩惱，謂迷事貪等。次三界根本亦空者，三界中肉煩惱，謂迷理見等諸空，與皮為本。後三界本無明藏亦空者，三界中心煩惱，謂所知障。所有諸空就勝說故但言無明，通為皮肉為根本故。三界根本亦空六字，言通肉心二種煩惱。一云：三界空者，結上業果二段文也。三界根本無明藏亦空者，謂三界中見修煩惱，就根本說但舉無明。

Commentary: Third, the emptiness of afflictions. There are two explanations for this. The first explanation, according to the Original Commentary (Benji), has three sections: First, "the three realms are empty" refers to the skin afflictions within the three realms, namely greed and the like that are confused about phenomena. Next, "the root of the three realms is also empty" refers to the flesh afflictions within the three realms, namely views and the like that are confused about principles, which serve as the root for the skin. Finally, "the storehouse of the fundamental ignorance of the three realms is also empty" refers to the heart afflictions within the three realms, namely the cognitive obscurations (jñeyāvaraṇa). Since all empties are spoken of in terms of the preeminent, it merely says ignorance, because it commonly serves as the root for the skin and flesh. The six characters "the root of the three realms is also empty" apply to both kinds of afflictions: flesh and heart. Another explanation says: "The three realms are empty" concludes the preceding two sections of text on karma and fruit. "The storehouse of fundamental ignorance of the three realms is also empty" refers to the afflictions of view and cultivation in the three realms; speaking in terms of the root, it merely mentions ignorance.