仁王經疏 2.371

2.371

釋曰：自下第四明相續假法。文別有三：一標宗、二反釋、三順結。此即初也。如《本記》云「一是常見，前後是一，無滅義故。異是斷見，前後各異，無續義故。故說其相非一非異。」

Commentary: From here on is the fourth part, explaining continuity designation phenomena. The text is divided into three parts: first, stating the thesis; second, explaining through negation; third, concluding in accord [with the premise]. This is the first part. As the Benji says: 'One would be the view of eternalism, because before and after being one, there would be no sense of cessation. Different would be the view of annihilationism, because before and after being distinctly different, there would be no sense of continuity. Therefore, their characteristic is said to be neither one nor different.'