仁王經疏 2.397

2.397

釋曰：第二、依文正釋。就內護中，文別有三：初〈觀空品〉明自利行、次〈教化品〉明利他行、後〈二諦品〉明二護所依。上來已釋前二行訖，即此第三二護所依。若依《本記》，於一品內大分為三：一問答分別二諦不二、二「白佛言」下問答分別說法不二、三「白佛言」下問答法門不二。今解：即分為五，初三同前；第四「大王七佛」下讚經功德；第五「大王此經」下讚名勸持。就初門中，先問、後答。問中有三：初兩徵、次雙難、後總結。此即初也。謂王兩徵：謂第一義諦中為有世諦耶、為無世諦耶（不者無也）？將欲設難，故作兩徵。

Commentary: Second, directly explaining according to the text. Regarding internal protection, the text is divided into three parts: first, the 'Chapter on Contemplating Emptiness' clarifies the practice of self-benefit; next, the 'Chapter on Teaching and Converting' clarifies the practice of benefiting others; finally, the 'Chapter on the Two Truths' clarifies the basis of the two protections. The preceding text has already explained the former two practices; this is the third, the basis of the two protections. If relying on the Benji, one chapter is broadly divided into three parts: first, questions and answers distinguishing that the two truths are non-dual; second, from 'addressed the Buddha, saying' onward, questions and answers distinguishing that the expounding of the Dharma is non-dual; third, from 'addressed the Buddha, saying' onward, questions and answers distinguishing that the Dharma approaches are non-dual. Now my interpretation is to divide it into five parts, the first three being identical to the above; fourth, from 'Great King, the seven buddhas' onward, praising the sūtra's merit; fifth, from 'Great King, this sūtra' onward, praising its title and encouraging upholding it. In the first section, there are first questions and then answers. In the question there are three parts: first, two inquiries; next, paired dilemmas; finally, a general conclusion. This is the first part. That is, the king presents two inquiries: within the paramārtha-satya, is there conventional truth, or is there no conventional truth ('not' means none)? Intending to set forth dilemmas, he therefore makes two inquiries.