仁王經疏 2.415

2.415

釋曰：第三、有一偈，明亡即不二、存即不一。文別有三：初之二句明真無義、次有一句顯俗有義、後有一句雙結有無。言無無諦者，遣名相之有，即是無義；得無名相之有，亦是無義。雙牒兩無，故名無無諦。即此二無，實是無也，故言實無。寂滅第一空者，遣前二無。謂前二無，對有之無，即安立諦，非究竟理。第二句明非安立諦斷惑證滅，故言寂滅；體即一味真如，故言第一義空。諸法因緣有者，釋俗有義。第四一句雙結，可知。然此三偈，諸說不同。有云：上來三行，初一人空、次一法空、第三雙牒二無，故言無無。有說：初偈出二諦體、次偈釋二諦義、後偈雙結二諦有無義。一云：顯其二諦有其三門，一無相因緣二諦門、次偈實假二諦門、後一偈有無二諦門。

Explanation: Third, there is one verse explaining that when negated, they are not two; when affirmed, they are not one. The text has three distinct parts: the first two lines explain the meaning of the nonexistence of the ultimate; the next line reveals the meaning of conventional existence; the last line jointly concludes existence and nonexistence. Regarding "the truth of non-nonexistence": dispensing with the existence of names and marks is itself the meaning of nonexistence; attaining the existence of marklessness and namelesness is also the meaning of nonexistence. Citing both nonexistences together, it is called "the truth of non-nonexistence." These very two nonexistences are truly nonexistent, hence it says "truly nonexistent." "Quieted and ceased, the supreme emptiness" dispenses with the preceding two nonexistences. That is, the preceding two nonexistences, being nonexistence relative to existence, are established truths, not the ultimate principle. The second line explains the unestablished truth: severing defilements and realizing cessation, it is therefore called "quieted and ceased"; its substance is the single-flavor tathatā, hence it says "supreme emptiness." "All phenomena exist through causes and conditions" explains the meaning of conventional existence. The fourth line jointly concludes them, as is evident. However, regarding these three verses, various explanations differ. Some say: of the preceding three verses, the first is the emptiness of persons, the next is the emptiness of phenomena, and the third cites both nonexistences together, hence saying "non-nonexistence." Some say: the first verse sets forth the substance of the two truths, the next verse explains the meaning of the two truths, and the final verse jointly concludes the meaning of the existence and nonexistence of the two truths. One says: they reveal that the two truths have three gates: first, the gate of the two truths of marklessness and conditioned origination; next verse, the gate of the two truths of the real and the designated; the last verse, the gate of the two truths of existence and nonexistence.