仁王經疏 2.495

2.495

釋曰：第三、結答。《本記》云「理論非一非二，俗乃無量」者，不然。本問有三：為一、為二、為無量？皆依俗義。

Exposition: Third, concluding the answer. When the Original Commentary says, "In principle they are neither one nor two, but conventionally they are immeasurable," this is not so. The original question had three parts: are they one, two, or immeasurable? All are based on the conventional meaning.