仁王護國般若波羅蜜多經疏 2.133

2.133

解曰：一無自他對。言自他者依色心立，互相形待，對他說自、對自說他；實相絕待，無自他故。二無名相對。言名相者，名謂能詮、相謂所詮，通有無也；實相非彼，無名相故。三無強弱對。言強弱者，謂色力等依觀待說；實相非彼，無強弱故。四無示說對。言示說者，有相故可顯示、有名故可演說；此無相故不可示、無名故不可說也。從此第三約垢淨明，文有六對。

Explanation: First, the pair of having neither self nor other. As for "self and other", they are established based on form and mind, mutually relative: relative to another one speaks of self, and relative to oneself one speaks of other; the real mark is absolute, having no self or other. Second, the pair of having neither name nor mark. As for "name and mark", name refers to the expressive, and mark refers to what is expressed, extending to both existence and non-existence; the real mark is not them, having no name or mark. Third, the pair of having neither strong nor weak. As for "strong and weak", they refer to physical strength and so forth, spoken of dependently; the real mark is not them, having neither strong nor weak. Fourth, the pair of having neither indication nor exposition. As for "indication and exposition", because there are marks, something can be displayed; because there are names, something can be expounded. Since this lacks marks, it cannot be indicated; since it lacks names, it cannot be expounded. From here is the third, explaining with reference to defilement and purity; the text has six pairs.