仁王護國般若波羅蜜多經疏 2.393

2.393

解曰：靜不違動，動而常寂，即動而靜，如虛空故。從此第二明菩薩境智。於中分二：一即境觀空、二即智觀空。初即境中，文分為二：一別相觀空、二總相觀空。初別相中，文分為二，初即法觀空、後即受觀空。初即法中，文復分三：且初第一標無生滅。

The commentary explains: Stillness does not contradict motion; in motion it is ever quiescent; precisely in motion it is still, because it is like empty space. From here, the second division explains the bodhisattvas' objects and cognition. In this, there are two parts: 1. Contemplating emptiness directly through the object; 2. Contemplating emptiness directly through cognition. In the first, through the object, the text is divided into two: 1. Contemplating emptiness in specific characteristics; 2. Contemplating emptiness in general characteristics. In the first, on specific characteristics, the text is divided into two: first, contemplating emptiness directly through phenomena; later, contemplating emptiness directly through feeling. In the first, through phenomena, the text is again divided into three parts. First, the first indicates non-arising and non-cessation.