法華經義記 4.42

4.42

問者言：「若盡智、無生智車體者，是則三無學人唯有盡、無生智，無有八智；七種學人唯有八智，無有盡智、無生智。」解釋者言：「無學人羅漢自具十智，但於十種智中，唯取盡智、無生智以當車體，其餘八智非正車體。若論七種學人，亦有盡、無生智，但有法不同故。如須陀洹照三途因盡，即是盡智，照三途果亡，即是無生智。今七種學人猶有三界生，云何有此盡智、無生智？且自三車本在門外，若便呼七種學人盡智、無生智為車體者，則是三車便在門內也。」

The questioner says: "If the knowledge of exhaustion and the knowledge of non-arising are the substance of the cart, then the three [types of] non-learners have only the knowledge of exhaustion and non-arising and do not have the eight knowledges, while the seven kinds of learners have only the eight knowledges and do not have the knowledge of exhaustion and knowledge of non-arising." The commentator says: "The non-learner arhat naturally possesses all ten knowledges; however, among the ten kinds of knowledge, we solely take the knowledge of exhaustion and knowledge of non-arising to correspond to the substance of the cart, while the remaining eight knowledges are not the primary substance of the cart. If we speak of the seven kinds of learners, they also have the knowledge of exhaustion and non-arising, but the dharmas they possess differ. For example, when a srotāpanna illuminates the exhaustion of the causes of the three evil destinies, that is the knowledge of exhaustion; illuminating the perishing of the effects of the three evil destinies is the knowledge of non-arising. Now, the seven kinds of learners still have births in the three realms; how could they have this [complete] knowledge of exhaustion and knowledge of non-arising? Furthermore, the three carts were originally outside the gate; if one were to call the knowledge of exhaustion and knowledge of non-arising of the seven kinds of learners the substance of the carts, then the three carts would be inside the gate."