法華玄義釋籤 1.109

1.109

「此等」下簡異，中二：先簡，次重判。初文者，《金剛藏》四句雖異，皆云是佛甚微智故，故前釋云皆被空有等破故也。本有常住權實不二，前之三教體皆不融，是故不與〈方便品〉中妙權實同。壽量實相遍於三界，前之三教體皆不遍，是故不與〈壽量品〉中雙非義同。

From "These and such" onward, it sets apart differences, in two parts: first, setting apart; next, re-classifying. In the first part: although the four propositions of Vajragarbha differ, they are all said to be the Buddha's extremely subtle wisdom; therefore the previous explanation stated that all are refuted by emptiness, existence, and so forth. Originally existent and eternally abiding, expedients and the real are non-dual; the essences of the preceding three teachings are all un-fused, and for this reason they are not identical to the wonderful expedients and real in the "Expedient Means" chapter. The true aspect of the "Lifespan" chapter pervades the three realms; the essences of the preceding three teachings are all non-pervasive, and for this reason they are not identical to the meaning of the double negation in the "Lifespan" chapter.