法華玄義釋籤 11.16

11.16

次明通中為二：初正釋，次「此通」下辨共不共。初又為三：先菩薩，次佛，三二乘。初菩薩又為三：初總述廢立意，次「立通」下明廢意，三「智者」下正明廢相。初如文。次文言「立通」者，若成四悉，即以見真名為教足。三正明廢相者，通真諦中既含不空，故但真諦仍為未極，是故責云那得恒住於空？利根菩薩即見不空，見不空已佛智尚廢，何況三乘？以彼教中不云彼佛破無明故。今破無明，是故通云通教則廢。次「菩薩」下明通佛果廢者，菩薩之因既廢，佛果豈存？次明共不共中四：初雙標，次分別，三「故知」下辨失，四「通教」下判廢不廢。方便聲聞有發心義，是故論廢；不共菩薩得於不空，此得即見理，是故不廢。

Next, explaining the Shared [Teaching] has two parts: first, the explanation proper; next, from "this Shared" onward, distinguishing the shared and non-shared. The first again has three parts: first, the bodhisattva; next, the Buddha; third, the two vehicles. The first, on the bodhisattva, again has three parts: first, generally recounting the intention of abrogation and establishment; next, from "establishing the Shared" onward, explaining the intention in abrogation; third, from "Zhizhe" onward, the characteristics of abrogation proper. The first is as in the text. In the next passage, where it says "establishing the Shared": if one accomplishes the four siddhāntas, seeing truth is termed the sufficiency of the teaching. Third, regarding the characteristics of abrogation proper: since within the true truth of the Shared [Teaching] non-emptiness is contained, merely [abiding in] the true truth is still not ultimate; therefore it reproaches them: how could one constantly abide in emptiness? Bodhisattvas of sharp faculties directly see non-emptiness; having seen non-emptiness, even the Buddha's wisdom is abrogated, let alone the three vehicles, because that teaching does not state that its Buddha breaks ignorance. Now that ignorance is broken, it is generally said that the Shared Teaching is then abrogated. Next, from "bodhisattva" onward, explaining the abrogation of the Buddha fruit in the Shared [Teaching]: once the bodhisattva cause is abrogated, how could the Buddha fruit remain? Next, in distinguishing the shared and non-shared, there are four parts: first, both headings; next, the distinction; third, from "therefore know" onward, discerning errors; fourth, from "Shared Teaching" onward, determining what is abrogated and what is not. Expedient śrāvakas have the meaning of generating the resolve, and therefore their abrogation is discussed; non-shared bodhisattvas attain non-emptiness, and this attainment is the vision of principle, so they are not abrogated.