法華玄義釋籤 20.44

20.44

次料簡釋疑中更一問答，以第一文顯示義深為問答意者，今言顯示不與前同，故般若淺易。次問者，般若望法華既未顯了，何故稱大？答文可見。次一問答，亦未顯理，故章安立問責竟，次亦以共不共破。

Next, within examining and resolving doubts, there is another question and answer; taking the profound meaning of manifest revelation in the first text as the intent of the question and answer: now saying "manifest revelation" is not the same as before, hence Prajñā is shallow and easy. The next question asks: since Prajñā, viewed in contrast to the Lotus, is not yet completely manifest, why is it called "Great"? The answering text can be seen. The subsequent question and answer also does not yet make the principle manifest; hence Zhang'an poses a question and censures it completely, and next also refutes it by means of the shared and unshared.