法華玄義釋籤 5.24

5.24

次正釋四種四諦中，標、列、釋。釋中二：先正釋，次破古。先正釋中三：先所依正教，次明立法差別意，三正釋。初文云「其義出涅槃聖行品」者，第十一第十二經廣明聖諦，今多依彼。然〈聖行〉中明四諦義兼含大小，若解生滅及以無量，其文則顯。無生無作文稍隱略，具如《止觀》第一記。然彼經文三藏四諦文中以略明四種四諦竟，後文廣釋耳。具如《止觀》第一記。次文者。

Next, in the correct explanation of the four kinds of four truths, there are the statement, the listing, and the explanation. In the explanation there are two parts: first, the correct explanation, and next, refuting the ancients. In the first part, the correct explanation, there are three: first, the correct teaching upon which it relies; next, clarifying the intention behind establishing the differences among the dharmas; third, the correct explanation itself. As for the first text saying 'its meaning comes from the "Noble Practices" chapter of the Nirvāṇa [Sūtra]': the eleventh and twelfth fascicles of the sūtra extensively elucidate the noble truths, and the present text mostly relies on them. However, in the 'Noble Practices' chapter, the elucidation of the meaning of the four truths contains both the Hīnayāna and the Mahāyāna; if one understands arising and cessation as well as the immeasurable, its text is explicit. The unarisen and the uncreated are somewhat obscure and brief in their text, fully as explained in the first fascicle of the Notes on Zhiguan. Moreover, in that sūtra text, the four kinds of four truths have already been briefly clarified within the passage on the four truths of the Tripiṭaka Teaching, and the later text merely explains them at length, fully as in the first fascicle of the Notes on Zhiguan. As for the next text: