法華玄義釋籤 5.38

5.38

次引證中云「大經云世諦」等者，彼又約世諦即第一義諦廣釋，釋世諦即苦集、第一義諦即道滅，欲令眾生於苦集中而見道滅，故云「即」耳。其實無有二法相即，故總結名中四諦秖是一實，一實秖是三德四德，是故雖有四名，四實無四，一尚無一云何四耶？故亦不次而論次第。若釋名出體亦具當分、跨節二義，四教審實理，四教種智覺同、教教主轉，秖是一音之教，如前可知。

Next, in citing proof, where it says "the Great Sūtra says worldly truth," and so forth: it also broadly explains in terms of the worldly truth being identical with the ultimate truth, explaining that the worldly truth is suffering and arising, while the ultimate truth is the path and cessation. Wishing to cause sentient beings to see the path and cessation within suffering and arising, it merely says "identical." In reality, there are no two dharmas that are identical with each other; therefore, in the general conclusion of names, the four truths are merely the one reality, and the one reality is merely the three virtues and the four virtues. Therefore, although there are four names, the four are in reality devoid of four; when even one does not exist, how could there be four? Hence, it discusses sequence without [actual] sequence. If explaining the name and bringing out the essence, it also possesses the two meanings of proper role and transcending steps. The verified real principle of the four teachings, the realization of the knowledge of all aspects across the four teachings being identical, and the rotating of the master of teaching by teaching, are merely the teaching of the single voice, as can be known from before.