法華文句記 10.193

10.193

三悉者，初世界，「悲華」下為人，「我行」下對治，若從勝他為名乃是賢於一切，名為普賢。言「即三悉」至「解釋也」者，既以翻名發願義當三悉，故云「復是」及以「又是行願」。「又行願」下，亦却指三悉並是行願，即是以三悉判行願也。未立第一義者，由釋賢故讓聖方名第一義，故《悲華》願兼於行，我行而兼於願。「由來」下次約教也。為四：先古人釋判屬三藏。「由來」者，由從也。謂古從來作此釋耳。以普賢名通義別，亦應云通於通別，文無者略，故知三教釋於普賢並謬。次「今明」去即從圓釋也。三「若十信」下更對前位，況破通別。四「今論」下重釋。

The three siddhāntas: the first is the mundane; from '*Karuṇāpuṇḍarīka*' downward is for the individual; from 'my practice' downward is the therapeutic. If named from surpassing others, it means being wiser than all, which is called 'Samantabhadra' (Universal Worthy). As for the words from 'namely the three siddhāntas' to 'explained': since translating the name and generating the vows correspond in meaning to the three siddhāntas, it says 'further is' and 'moreover are practice and vows'. Downward from 'Moreover, practice and vows', it also points back to the three siddhāntas as all being practice and vows; that is, using the three siddhāntas to classify practice and vows. The reason the supreme truth has not yet been established is that in explaining 'worthy' (bhadra), yielding to the sages is only then called the supreme truth; therefore, the vows in the *Karuṇāpuṇḍarīka* encompass practice, and 'my practice' encompasses vows. From 'Historically' downward, it next classifies according to the teachings. There are four parts: first, ancient explanations classified it under the Tripiṭaka. 'Historically' (yóulái) means 'from of old'. It means that ancients historically made this explanation. Because the name Samantabhadra is common while its meaning is distinct, it should also be said to be common to the shared and distinct [teachings]; that it is absent in the text is an abbreviation. Thus we know that explaining Samantabhadra by means of the three teachings is completely erroneous. Next, from 'Now we clarify' onward, it explains it according to the perfect [teaching]. Third, from 'If the ten faiths' downward, it further compares it with the preceding stages to overturn the shared and distinct teachings. Fourth, from 'Now we discuss' downward, it explains it again.