法華玄論 3.54

3.54

答：不例也。初辨《波若》廣明實相等二義故勝，《法華》不專明二義故《法華》劣耳。不言《波若》明義已了、《法華》明義未了以判勝劣。若是《法華》勝《波若》劣者，正就了不了判也。

Answer: They are not analogous. At first, determining that Prajñā broadly clarifies the two meanings such as the true mark makes it superior, while the Lotus does not exclusively clarify the two meanings, so the Lotus is merely inferior in that regard. It did not judge superiority and inferiority on the basis of Prajñā's clarified meaning being definitive and the Lotus's clarified meaning being non-definitive. Where the Lotus is superior and Prajñā is inferior, it is judged precisely on the basis of being definitive and non-definitive.