法華玄論 2.26
English (machine translation) 2.26
- Language
- English
2.26
The eighth is clarifying the three guidings. Throughout Śākyamuni's single dispensation, from beginning to end, there are three guidings: before the Lotus Sūtra, it is called guiding the heterodox to return to the orthodox. Before the Buddha appeared in the world, there were two kinds of heterodox teachings: first, the ninety-six arts of the renunciant non-Buddhists; second, all worldly householder sentient beings. Although these two kinds differ, neither is the Buddha Dharma, and so they are named heterodox. The Tathāgata appeared in the world to guide these two heterodoxies to return to the orthodox teachings of the five vehicles: among these two kinds of people, for those who had heard nothing and followed wrongful ways, he matured them through the roots of goodness of humans and devas; for those with the capacities of the three vehicles, he transformed and delivered them through the Dharma of the three vehicles; thus he guided these two heterodoxies to return to the orthodoxy of the five vehicles. Second, guiding the divergent to return to the identical: although they were freed from the two heterodoxies before the Lotus Sūtra, they still clung to the five divergences; therefore, he guided the five divergences to return to the one vehicle, which is the meaning of the first section. Third, guiding the cause to return to the fruition: although the five vehicles entered the one vehicle, they were still at the causal stage; therefore, he guided the cause to return to the fruition, causing them to realize the dharmakāya. Just as the śrāvakas' reception and understanding clarifies the beginning of the ten faiths, Maitreya's dispelling of doubt discerns the culmination of the ten stages. Guiding these two causes, beginning and end, to return to the fruition of the Tathāgata's ultimate dharmakāya. These three guidings leave out no teaching and exhaust no meaning; they are not limited to Śākyamuni, but pervade all buddhas. Having reached ultimacy through the three guidings, it is called the complete sūtra, which is the definitive meaning of eternal abiding. Moreover, because the three guidings are ultimate, the subsequent chapters clarify that many people attain the Path. Prior to the Lotus Sūtra, there was only the first guiding and not yet the second guiding, so those who attained the Path were few. If the latter section still clarified impermanence, there would only be two guidings and no third guiding. Furthermore, there would only be guiding the śrāvakas and no guiding the bodhisattvas; because the śrāvakas did not believe in the one, they are now made to enter the one, and thus the śrāvakas are guided. Since bodhisattvas and the Buddha would both be impermanent, how could he guide the bodhisattvas? Moreover, he could not guide the śrāvakas either. Why is this? If all buddhas and their disciples—the śrāvaka and pratyekabuddha saṅghas—were all impermanent bodies, how could he guide them? Furthermore, if the Buddha were impermanent, it would cause people of the two vehicles to give rise to thoughts of regression and no longer seek buddhahood. In addition, the three vehicles are still impermanent, which is termed the half-word; the Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra says, "For the sake of śrāvakas, he spoke the half-word." This sūtra directly teaches bodhisattvas; how could it speak the half-word?
Linked texts (1)
- 法華玄論 — Classical Chinese