法華玄論 9.170

English (machine translation) 9.170

Language: English

9.170

Question: If it equally dismantles beginning and end to clarify being without beginning or end, why is having no end long—so that it says 'again double'—while having no beginning is short, merely saying that one [in the position of] succession cannot know it?

Previous: 9.169
Next: 9.171
Up: 9

Linked texts (1)

法華玄論 — Classical Chinese