法華遊意 1.110

1.110

今總觀經論，宜開四句不同：一、破而不取，二、取而不破，三、亦取亦破，四、不取不破。言破而不取者，今不與舊同亦不與舊異。所以然者，求上來義不成，或不可與其同、或不可與其異。求上諸義既不可得，與誰論同異耶？

Now, observing the sūtras and treatises generally, one should open four distinct propositions: 1. refuting without adopting; 2. adopting without refuting; 3. both adopting and refuting; 4. neither adopting nor refuting. Concerning 'refuting without adopting': now it is neither identical with the old nor different from the old. Why is this? If one seeks the aforementioned meanings, they are untenable; one can neither be identical with them nor different from them. Since seeking the aforementioned meanings finds nothing to be grasped, with whom could one discuss identity and difference?