法華玄贊義決 1.145

1.145

此等諸文據決定說，有學迴心及受變易俱不定，故不障名出。若不如是應不索車，若未索車如何與記？若云在宅亦得索車行記，得車即應有學乘車出宅，若爾即便有學勝無學，宅內得車故。若云有學未名得車，說無學故者，云何無學得記即名索車與車，有學得記不名索車與車？若云或苦在故不得名索車與車，七地已前亦爾，思之。

These various passages are spoken with reference to the determinate. Trainees who turn the mind and receive inconceivable transformation are all indeterminate; therefore this does not obstruct calling it emerging. If it were not so, they should not seek the cart; if they had not yet sought the cart, how could they be given the prediction? If one says that while in the house they also can seek the cart and receive the prediction, then having obtained the cart, trainees should ride the cart out of the house. If so, then trainees would surpass non-trainees, because they obtained the cart inside the house. If one says that trainees are not yet said to obtain the cart because [the text] speaks of non-trainees, why would non-trainees receiving the prediction be said to seek the cart and be given the cart, while trainees receiving the prediction are not said to seek the cart and be given the cart? If one says that because suffering may still remain they cannot be said to seek the cart and be given the cart, this is also true before the seventh bhūmi. Ponder this.