金剛三昧經論 1.103

1.103

論曰：此是第四問答遣增減見。謂諸學者猶作是念：入觀之心取無相理，捨諸相事。為遣此增益見，故言不取不捨。或作是念：入觀之時都無所住法亦無能住心，如是不異於畢竟無為。除此損減見，故言住於不心、住於不法。雖非有住而非無住，非無住故得言住也。

The commentary says: This is the fourth [section], a question-and-answer dispelling views of superimposition and deprecation. That is to say, practitioners still think like this: the mind entering contemplation grasps the signless principle and abandons the matters of various signs. To dispel this view of superimposition, it is said that it "neither accepts nor rejects." Or they think like this: when entering contemplation, there is absolutely no dharma in which to abide, nor is there a mind that can abide; in this way it would not be different from complete non-existence. To remove this view of deprecation, it is said that it "abides in non-mind, abides in non-dharma." Although it is not an abiding, neither is it a non-abiding; because it is not a non-abiding, it can be called abiding.