金剛三昧經論 2.153

2.153

論曰：此是第三領解。不合成者，非心、非心所，心與心所別體相應故。不獨成者，非自性、非差別，是二義別無二體故。不羈者，非名、非義故，名義互為客故。不伴者，非影質故，影質相類而為伴故。不聚散者，非空、非色故，聚集為色、散壞為空故。不生滅者，非不相應、非無為故。不相應行是生起故，諸無為法滅所顯故。此領前說離六雙義。亦無來相者，非生之所生生故。及以去相者，非滅之所滅滅故。是領後說法爾清淨。初言不可思議者，非如之如離心言故。後言不可思議者，離心之心亦離二故。

The commentary states: This is the third [part], the expression of understanding. 'Not formed through combination': it is neither mind nor mental factor, because mind and mental factors have distinct substances and correspond with each other. 'Nor are they formed in isolation': it is neither intrinsic nature nor differentiating characteristics, because these two have distinct meanings but no two substances. 'Neither bound': because it is neither name nor meaning, since name and meaning are mutually guests. 'Nor partnered': because it is neither shadow nor substance, since shadow and substance belong to mutual types and serve as partners. 'They neither gather nor disperse': because it is neither space nor form, since accumulating constitutes form and breaking apart constitutes space. 'They are neither born nor extinguished': because it is neither non-associated nor unconditioned. Non-associated formations are generated, while all unconditioned dharmas are revealed by cessation. This expresses understanding of the previously explained meaning of being free from the six pairs. 'Nor do they have the characteristic of coming' is because it is not born from that which generates birth. 'Or the characteristic of going' is because it is not extinguished from that which extinguishes cessation. This expresses understanding of the subsequent explanation of natural purity. Saying 'inconceivable' at first is because the thusness of non-thusness is free from mind and speech. Saying 'inconceivable' at the end is because the mind free from mind is also free from the two.