金剛三昧經論 2.9

2.9

論曰：是第二答。答意有二：先示無生忍相、後顯有得過失。無生法忍者，達法本無生，是則定慧諸行亦無有生，非於無生有能忍行，故言非無生行。於中有得能忍之行，則乖真忍無住無行，故言即為虛妄。

The commentary states: This is the second [division], the answer. The intent of the answer has two parts: first, indicating the characteristics of the tolerance of non-arising, and later, revealing the error of possessing attainment. 'Tolerance of the non-arising of dharmas' means realizing that dharmas are originally unarisen; this being so, all practices of concentration and wisdom are likewise without arising, not that there is an active practice of tolerance toward non-arising—hence it says 'yet not a practice of non-arising'. If within this there is an attainment of an active practice of tolerance, it would contradict true tolerance being without abiding and without practice; hence it says 'is itself false and delusive'.