金剛三昧經論 2.29

2.29

The treatise states: This is the second, cross-examining regarding having realization. The intent of the examination is to say: When you enter into contemplation on the forbearance of the unarisen, do you attain unarisen practice by relying on the principle of the unarisenness of all conditioned practices? The reason for cross-examining in this way is that the other made the unarisenness of principle distinct from the unarisenness of practice and challenged that the unarisenness of principle must also be the unarisenness of practice. Now he cross-examines: 'When you enter contemplation, are principle and practice distinct, possessing an agent and an object?'