大方廣佛華嚴經疏 11.22

11.22

二釋中十事。一海中包數同，則盡海之塵，一塵一剎已是含攝之義；二佛示威力同；三道場同，同真性故；四眾會同，常隨眾故；五光明、六名號、七音聲、八法輪方便，上七皆約不動一而普遍無差；九塵含剎海、十塵容佛境；此二約不壞相而廣容無差。頌中十頌，如次頌上十義，但第六約身，與前名體異耳。而前但約平漫無差，今顯塵內重疊融攝無差之義。若云約共同事者，何以不言染同、業苦同，豈世界海中都無此耶？

Second, the ten items in the explanation: First, the number contained within the ocean is identical: thus, exhausting the dust motes of the ocean, one dust mote containing one land is already the meaning of containment. Second, the Buddhas' manifestation of mighty power is identical. Third, the bodhimaṇḍas are identical, because their true nature is identical. Fourth, the assemblies are identical, because they constantly accompany the multitude. Fifth, the lights; sixth, the names; seventh, the sounds; eighth, the expedients of the Dharma-wheel: the above seven are all based on not moving from the one yet being universally non-different. Ninth, dust motes containing oceans of lands; tenth, dust motes accommodating the Buddha-realm: these two are based on not destroying marks yet being broadly accommodating and non-different. Among the verses are ten gāthās, which versify the above ten meanings in sequence, except that the sixth concerns the body, differing in name and essence from the preceding. And while the former merely pertained to level and boundless non-difference, the present reveals the meaning of layered interpenetration and non-difference within dust motes. If one says this is in terms of shared phenomena, why does it not speak of sharing defilement and sharing karmic suffering? Could there be none of this within the ocean of worlds?