大方廣佛華嚴經疏 50.19

50.19

第九「佛子至應知如來」下明周于法界，釋上無量。無量有二：一廣多無量。一毛含多，遍法界故；二無分量，皆不生故。文中三：初明一毛含多，釋以不生故。此與前段分有分異。又此唯現佛，即同類相望；前通多類，即異類相入。又前則住體遍應，此則如理而含亦如理而遍。二「如一毛」下類顯多毛，但容毛處即是毛孔。次徵意云：身契無生，可許能含法界；虛空無有能契，何能亦含？釋云：無處不至則無非佛身矣，是謂大包天地、細入無間。三「隨其」下釋疑。疑云：若爾，何以要就覺樹？釋云：隨機所能受耳。是知坐菩提樹多身頓成尚曰隨宜，有頂、鹿園豈為真極？

Ninth, from "O sons of the Buddha, you should know that the Tathāgata" downward clarifies pervading the dharmadhātu, explaining "immeasurable" above. "Immeasurable" has two aspects: first, immeasurability in vastness and multiplicity, because a single hair contains many, pervading the dharmadhātu; second, having no measure of parts, because none are produced. In this text there are three parts: first, clarifying that a single hair contains many, explained through their being unproduced. This differs somewhat from the preceding section. Furthermore, here only buddhas are manifested, which is mutual relation among the same kind; the preceding [section] extended to many kinds, which is mutual entry among different kinds. Also, the preceding was abiding in the essence and universally responding, whereas this is containing in accordance with the noumenon and also pervading in accordance with the noumenon. Second, from "Just as in a single hair" downward analogously reveals the many hairs; wherever there is room for a hair is itself a pore. Next, investigating the meaning, it says: The body tallies with non-production, so it may be granted that it can contain the dharmadhātu; space has nothing capable of tallying, so how can it also contain it? The explanation says: Since there is no place it does not reach, there is nothing that is not the Buddha's body. This is called grandly encompassing heaven and earth, subtly entering where there is no space between. Third, from "In accordance with" downward resolves a doubt. The doubt asks: If so, why must it be at the Bodhi tree? The explanation says: It is merely in accordance with what beings' capacities can receive. From this we know that sitting under the Bodhi tree and頓 achieving many bodies all at once is still called an accommodation according to what is appropriate; how could the Peak of Existence or the Deer Park be the ultimate truth?