大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 12.9

12.9

疏「隨聲取義有五過失」者，即《十地論》釋示說分齊中文。論云「一不正信，隨言生解，不稱實故。二退勇猛，不能亡相趣實理故。三者誑他，以己謬解為人說故。四者謗佛，指己謬解是佛說故。五者輕法，以淺近解解深旨故。」下文具釋。疏「下經云設有菩薩」等者，即〈出現品〉，如前已引。「地獄天子」，即〈隨好品〉。「大海劫火」，即〈十地品〉。故彼偈云「雖住海水劫火中，堪受此法必得聞。」是也。疏「約未悟入故名為兼」者，通外難也。恐有難云：既有頓超之益，即是當機，何名兼為？通意可知。

Regarding the Commentary's stating, "Grasping the meaning according to the sound has five faults": this is the text in the Daśabhūmika-śāstra explaining the scope of the exposition. The treatise says: "First, improper faith, because generating understanding according to words does not correspond to reality. Second, falling back from vigor, because one cannot forget characteristics and advance toward the real truth. Third, deceiving others, because one speaks to people based on one's own mistaken understanding. Fourth, slandering the Buddha, because one points to one's own mistaken understanding as what the Buddha taught. Fifth, disparaging the Dharma, because one interprets profound purports with shallow and proximate understanding." The text below explains this in full. In the Commentary, "The sūtra below says, 'Even if there were a bodhisattva,'" and so forth refers to the "Chapter on the Manifestation [of the Tathāgata]," as cited previously. "The devaputra in hell" refers to the "Chapter on the Accompanying Auspicious Signs." "The great ocean and the kalpa fire" refers to the "Chapter on the Ten Grounds." Hence its verse states: / "Even if abiding in the ocean water or the kalpa fire, / One who is worthy of receiving this Dharma will surely hear it." / This is it. In the Commentary, "It is termed 'concurrent' in terms of those who have not yet awakened and entered" resolves an external objection. It is feared that someone might object: "Since there is the benefit of sudden transcendence, they are the primary audience; why call them concurrent?" The intention of the resolution is evident.