大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 24.39

24.39

疏「無生為佛法體故」者，諸經論中皆詮無生之理，故《淨名》不二發始明之，《楞伽經》說一切不生，《中論》不生為論宗體。傅大士亦云：「佛法以無生為體、無著為宗。忘想為因、涅槃為果。」諸文非一。

Regarding the commentary's statement, "Because unarisenness is the essence of the Buddha's teaching": all sūtras and treatises explain the principle of unarisenness. Therefore, the *Vimalakīrti-nirdeśa* explains it from the very beginning of the Non-duality [chapter], the *Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra* states that all things are unarisen, and the *Madhyamakaśāstra* takes unarisenness as the central doctrine and essence of the treatise. Mahāsattva Fu also said: "The Buddha-Dharma takes unarisenness as its essence and non-attachment as its central doctrine; forgetting thoughts is the cause, and nirvāṇa is the fruit." The texts [stating this] are not one.