大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 25.42

25.42

疏「觀乃觀海歎乃歎智」者，下釋妨難，即心口相違難，此難因前而生。於中四：一問；二「智之與海」下答；三「若爾」下重難，即歎說不同難，此難望後說分而生；四「智離海境」下辯答。答中二：先約教相，謂智之異相，因所知故。二「又表」以下約證相，海是所證故。

Regarding the Commentary's statement, "The contemplation contemplates the oceans, while the praise praises the wisdom": below, it explains an objection, namely the objection concerning conflict between mind and mouth. This objection arises because of what precedes. In it there are four parts: first, the question; second, from "wisdom and the ocean" downward, the reply; third, from "If so" downward, a re-objection, namely the objection that praise and exposition differ, an objection that arises with an eye to the subsequent expounded portion; fourth, from "wisdom detached from the object of the ocean" downward, the clarifying reply. In the reply there are two parts: first, in terms of doctrinal characteristics, meaning that the different characteristics of wisdom are due to the objects known. Second, from "Moreover, it expresses" downward, in terms of realized characteristics, because the ocean is what is realized.