大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 30.29

30.29

疏「後半重釋」等者，前半云難可量，則心行處滅。言說莫及，則言語道斷。今重釋者，何以寂滅諸相心言罔及耶？釋意云：寂滅是不和合義，隨樂皆見是和合義，今亦不可作合與不合而知而說故。重釋云：於中寄三身說。初約法身住體遍應釋，則前無相寂滅，即是住體；隨樂皆見，即是遍應故。今以二義相奪，故非合不合。其住體遍應猶如虛空，隨其竅隙方圓大小。二「緣起修成」下，約報身修成契實說。如鑄金成像，像全同金，亦互奪叵說。三「又緣即非緣」下，約化身應緣說。猶如影像有而即虛，亦二相奪，不可得說。已釋上句，從「合相離故」下釋下句，可知。

Regarding the commentary's: "The second half re-explains..." and so forth: The first half states that it is "difficult to measure," which means the locus of mental activity is extinguished; "speech cannot reach it," which means the path of words is cut off. Now, why re-explain it by saying that all marks are quiescent and extinguished so that mind and words fail to reach it? The intended explanation is: quiescence and extinction signify non-conjunction, while "seen by all according to their inclinations" signifies conjunction. Now, it cannot be conceived or spoken of as either conjoined or unconjoined. Thus it is re-explained: herein, it is explained by lodging it in the three bodies. First, in terms of the dharmakāya's abiding in essence while universally responding: the aforementioned marklessness, quiescence, and extinction are its abiding essence; "seen by all according to their inclinations" is its universal response. Now, as the two senses negate each other, it is neither conjoined nor unconjoined. Its abiding essence and universal response are like empty space matching apertures that are square, round, large, or small. Second, from "conditioned arising cultivated and accomplished" onward: it is explained in terms of the saṃbhogakāya's cultivation-accomplishment tallying with reality. Like casting gold into an image, the image is entirely identical with gold; they also mutually negate each other and cannot be spoken of. Third, from "furthermore, conditions are precisely non-conditions" onward: it is explained in terms of the nirmāṇakāya responding to conditions. Like reflections, which exist yet are instantly empty, the two also mutually negate each other and cannot be attained through speech. The upper line having been explained, from "conjoined marks are abandoned" onward the lower line is explained, which can be understood.