大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 33.31

33.31

疏「尚未了唯心」者，上躡前分別之義，為不入法性之由。此下舉況釋不入義。然其要觀略有二種：一唯心識觀、二真如實觀。唯心觀淺尚未能了，真如觀妙彼安能入？法性即是真如異名。

Regarding the commentary's "and has not yet comprehended mind-only": above, it followed the preceding sense of conceptualisation as the reason for not entering dharmatā. From here down, it adduces a comparative analogy to explain the meaning of not entering. There are, in brief, two essential contemplations: first, the contemplation of mind-and-consciousness only; second, the contemplation of reality as it is—tathatā. If one cannot even comprehend the contemplation of mind-only, which is shallow, how could one enter the contemplation of tathatā, which is profound and wondrous? Dharmatā is merely an alternative name for tathatā.