大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 37.65

37.65

疏「然十地論釋」下，料揀同異。於中二：一辨加定因緣、二明加定先後。前中三：初引論例釋、二敘昔順違、三申今正義。今初，謂諸佛遮那皆由願力故，二願皆為加因。而言「四段」者，即上四因，謂諸佛有一、遮那有二、威神為三、自善為四，故而論但有二因。今以遮那之願是加因，例於後二，亦加因耳。

Regarding the Commentary's statement "However, the explanation of the Daśabhūmika-śāstra..." onwards: it distinguishes similarities and differences. Therein are two: first, discerning the causes and conditions of empowerment and samādhi; second, clarifying the sequence of empowerment and samādhi. Within the former are three: first, citing the treatise to explain by analogy; second, recounting past views regarding accordance and contradiction; third, setting forth the present correct doctrine. Now for the first: this means that both the Buddhas and Vairocana act through the power of vows; therefore, both vows are causes of empowerment. As for saying "four passages," these are the four causes above, namely: the Buddhas have one, Vairocana has two, spiritual power is three, and one's own goodness is four; yet the treatise has only two causes. Now, taking Vairocana's vow as a cause of empowerment, by analogy to the latter two, they are also causes of empowerment.