大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 57.35

57.35

疏「二總結發心中」，疏文有四：一略釋。二「而論」下，辯論釋。三「前指於此」下，辯論指文不同前，即指此結文。欲以後攝於前，此則指前總句。欲明以前攝後，總之與結皆是總義，故結云「總攝別故」。四「又但云生心」者，釋通妨難。論有二問二答，疏亦兩節。一問云：前求佛智，何故唯云生如是心，不云生智？故今答云：心是總故，已攝於智，知斷證修。二「亦攝」下，亦有問言：別有諸德，何故但云生如是心？答云：心亦是總，總攝諸德，故不別舉助道等法。亦應問言：心既是總，攝於知斷證修，何故前文不求佛心？有二義故：一前是所求、此是能求，故二果位智強，心不可知故。疏「明以何因生如是心」者，此是論文。此中疏文問意稍略，應云：「第三以大悲」下，明以何因。次應更云：謂以何因生如是心？今以先科文便釋意耳。從「意云」下，疏釋論文，引於二經，成立論意。

Regarding the Commentary's: "Second, concluding summary of generating the aspiration [to awakening]", the text of the Commentary has four parts: 1. A brief explanation. 2. From "And the Treatise..." onward, determining the Treatise's explanation. 3. From "The previous refers to this..." onward, determining that the Treatise's references to the text differ: the previous refers to this concluding text, wishing to gather the previous by the latter; here it refers to the previous general clause, wishing to clarify that the previous gathers the latter. Both "general" and "conclusion" carry the general meaning, so it concludes: "The general gathers the specific." 4. Regarding "Furthermore, simply saying 'generating the mind'": it resolves an objection. The Treatise has two questions and two answers, and the Commentary likewise has two sections. The first question says: "Previously, one sought Buddha-knowledge; why does it now only speak of 'generating such a mind' and not 'generating knowledge'?" Therefore, it now answers: "Because the mind is general, it already includes knowledge—knowing, abandoning, realizing, and cultivating." Second, from "also gathers..." onward, there is also a question: "There are separately various virtues; why does it merely say 'generating such a mind'?" The answer says: "The mind is also general, encompassing all virtues; thus, it does not separately cite the dharmas assisting the path, and so forth." One might also ask: "Since the mind is general and includes knowing, abandoning, realizing, and cultivating, why did the previous text not seek the Buddha-mind?" Because of two meanings: first, the previous was that which is sought, while this is that which seeks; second, at the stage of the fruit, knowledge is prominent and mind is unknowable. Regarding the Commentary's: "Explaining by what cause one generates such a mind": this is the text of the Treatise. Here, the questioning intent in the Commentary is slightly abbreviated; it should say: "From 'Third, with great compassion...' onward, it explains by what cause." Next, it should further say: "Meaning, by what cause does one generate such a mind?" Here, by first outlining the headings of the text, it easily explains the meaning. From "The meaning is..." onward, the Commentary explains the Treatise's text, citing two sūtras to establish the intent of the Treatise.