大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 59.106

59.106

疏「然邪見惡戒唯是外邪」者，邪見唯外。戒取有二：一者惡戒獨頭而起，此正是邪，故偏舉之；二附正戒起，今所不取。見取亦二：一執異見，亦獨頭起；二附內法起。而戒取多獨頭起，故偏語惡戒為邪見取，少獨頭起故。多分附內，以難見故。疏家偏明不獨起故，故疏云「通內」，則知有外。

Regarding the Commentary's statement, "However, wrong views and evil precepts belong exclusively to external heterodoxies": wrong views are exclusively external. The adherence to rules and rituals (*śīlavrataparāmarśa*) has two types: first, evil precepts that arise independently—this is strictly heterodox, and therefore is singled out; second, arising in dependence on correct precepts, which is not what is taken here. The adherence to views (*dṛṣṭiparāmarśa*) also has two types: first, grasping at divergent views, which also arises independently; second, arising in dependence on the inner teaching. Because adherence to rules and rituals mostly arises independently, evil precepts are singled out as heterodox; adherence to views rarely arises independently, mostly relying on the inner [teachings] because it is difficult to perceive. Because the commentator specifically clarifies that it does not arise independently, the Commentary states that it "pervades the internal," from which we know that external instances also exist.