大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 61.50

61.50

疏「若依小乘」下，約教揀異。故《俱捨》云「初二樂輕安」，則顯前論皆約樂受。「又此正斷」下，明其所宜，此亦遮難。難言：一種相攝，何不舉不憂不喜攝苦樂耶？答云：一五受中無別名故；二所對樂近，憂苦遠故，先已斷故。

Regarding the commentary's "If according to the Hīnayāna" downward: it distinguishes differences according to the teachings. Thus the Kośa says: "The first two have the bliss of pliancy", which shows that the previous treatises all referred to the feeling of bliss (sukha-vedanā). From "Furthermore, this directly severs" downward clarifies its appropriateness; this also fends off an objection. The objection says: Being subsumed in the same manner, why not raise neither-grief-nor-joy to subsume suffering and bliss? The reply says: First, among the five sensations there is no distinct name; second, the bliss it opposes is near, whereas grief and suffering are far, having been severed previously.