大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 63.32

63.32

疏「寂滅通結餘句」者，無覆無慢，受教得旨，皆寂滅義。此依古釋直順經文。若準論經，三句小異，忍名善心成就，調柔云寂滅，寂滅云善寂滅。論云「善心成就」者，是對治修行。「增長故」者，結前增上心欲果。此果從前第三分護煩惱行及護小乘行二種對治生。彼治此滿，故名善心。今云忍者，即忍可也。論云「寂滅心成就」者，是前對治修行增長力故。即結前二離障果，由護煩惱對治家力得無二障故。既無二障，故曰「調柔」。論云「如是善寂滅心成就者，彼果前二句顯。」釋曰：善即初句，寂滅即第二句。總合上二為善寂滅，成彼報恩心果，云彼果前二句顯。「由此一果通從前二種對治增上及二遠離生故。」釋曰：總上三句，結前四果。

On the commentary's "quiescence generally concludes the remaining clauses": being without concealment and without arrogance, receiving instruction and grasping the meaning, are all the meaning of quiescence. This follows the ancient commentary in directly according with the sūtra text. If evaluated by the treatise's sūtra, the three clauses differ slightly: forbearance is named the accomplishment of a wholesome mind; pliant is called quiescence; and quiescence is called wholesome quiescence. When the treatise says "accomplishment of a wholesome mind," it is the cultivation of antidotes. "Because of increasing" concludes the previous fruit of the desire of the superior mind. This fruit is generated from the two kinds of antidotes in the previous third section: the practice of guarding against afflictions and the practice of guarding against the Small Vehicle. Those antidotes are here fulfilled, hence it is called a wholesome mind. Here, saying "forbearance" means approval. When the treatise says "accomplishment of a quiescent mind," it is by the power of the increase in the cultivation of the previous antidotes. That is, it concludes the previous two fruits of transcending obstacles, because through the power of the antidote of guarding against afflictions, one attains freedom from the two obstacles. Having freed oneself from the two obstacles, it is called "pliant." When the treatise says "accomplishing such a wholesome quiescent mind, that fruit is revealed by the preceding two clauses," the commentary explains: "wholesome" is the first clause, and "quiescence" is the second clause. Synthesizing the above two as wholesome quiescence accomplishes that fruit of the thought of repaying kindness; thus it says that that fruit is revealed by the preceding two clauses. "Because this single fruit is universally generated from the increase of the preceding two kinds of antidotes and from the two transcendences": the explanation says that synthesizing the above three clauses concludes the previous four fruits.