大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 66.22

66.22

疏「於四緣中」下，第二廣顯差別。即《唯識》緣生中諸門分別內四緣分別門，疏多依彼。就文有四：一總顯具闕、二別釋有無、三結例無方、四會通經意。今初，彼論具云「諸支相望，增上定有，餘之三緣有無不定。契經依定，唯說有一。」釋曰：對疏可知。然增上體寬，故皆定有。餘三緣局，故有無不定。

Regarding the commentary's statement, "Among the four conditions": Second, extensively clarifying distinctions. This corresponds to the section distinguishing the four conditions within the various categorical distinctions in the dependent origination section of the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi; the commentary mostly relies on it. Concerning the text, there are four points: first, generally showing completeness and deficiency; second, separately explaining presence and absence; third, concluding that there is no fixed pattern; fourth, reconciling and synthesizing the sūtra's intent. Now, in the first, that treatise states in full: "Looking at the limbs in relation to each other, the sovereign condition is definitely present; the presence or absence of the remaining three conditions is indeterminate. The sūtra, relying on what is definite, speaks only of one." The explanation states: Comparing with the commentary, it can be understood. Because the sovereign [condition's] scope is broad, it is always definitely present. The remaining three conditions are limited, so their presence or absence is indeterminate.