大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 7.46

7.46

疏「後時」下，第三時教。「緣生即空」者，緣生即依他，依他即空，不存依他空遍計也。「平等一味」者，空有一味，非空外說有、有外說空，空有相即故無異味，見空即是見有、見有即是見空。空有二體既同，何要偏留依他、但空遍計？

From the commentary's "In the subsequent period" downward is the teaching of the third period. "Arising from conditions is precisely emptiness": arising from conditions is precisely the dependent [nature], and the dependent is precisely empty, without preserving the dependent while emptying the imagined. "Equal and of a single flavor": emptiness and existence are of a single flavor; it is not that existence is spoken of outside of emptiness, nor that emptiness is spoken of outside of existence. Because emptiness and existence are identical, there is no different flavor; seeing emptiness is seeing existence, and seeing existence is seeing emptiness. Since the two essences of emptiness and existence are identical, why should one partially retain the dependent and empty only the imagined?