大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 70.30

70.30

疏「論又別釋」下，第二重釋根等相似之義，即重釋上依共之言。以言共者，共是於業，復相似故。於中四：一生起論文。二「彼復定不定時」下，舉論。三「由下經文」下，彰釋所以，由相似故。經舉根林以例三林，論上云共，故今顯共相似之義。四「亦須約時」下，正釋論文為四，展轉相生，皆徵上起下。而文分五：一釋彼復定不定時，云「亦須約時躡上四義」。但云亦須約時，合云根等四林亦須約時。亦者，釋論「復」字，以前釋三聚約時，今重約時，故云亦也。二「約何論時」下，第二節，徵於上句，釋下根等次第。三「云何次第」下，徵上第二，釋下根等相似。四「似何等」下，徵上第三，釋下「信等」二字。五「如宿習」下，顯上相似次第之義。唯初根解，此二相望，有於次第及與相似，以性欲但明相似之義，次第可知，故略無之。疏「若相似未熟」下，第三例釋三聚。三聚亦由上四生故，是故上云三聚為總。

Regarding the commentary's statement from "The treatise also separately explains..." downwards: second, it re-explains the meaning of similarity among faculties and so forth; that is, it re-explains the statement above regarding "based on the common." Because in saying "common," they are common in being karma and are furthermore similar. Within this there are four: first, it introduces the text of the treatise; second, from "Those, furthermore, at determinate and indeterminate times..." downwards, it cites the treatise; third, from "Because the sūtra text below..." downwards, it reveals the reason for the explanation, which is due to similarity. The sūtra adduces the thicket of faculties to serve as an analogy for the three thickets; the treatise above says "common," and therefore it now reveals the meaning of common similarity. Fourth, from "It is also necessary to consider time..." downwards, it directly explains the treatise text in four parts, evolving successively, all inquiring into what precedes to raise what follows. The text is divided into five: First, explaining "Those, furthermore, at determinate and indeterminate times," it says, "It is also necessary to consider time, following upon the four meanings above." Merely saying "it is also necessary to consider time" should properly say that the four thickets of faculties and so forth also must be considered in terms of time. "Also" explains the word "furthermore" in the treatise; because the previous explanation of the three groups considered time, and now it repeatedly considers time, it says "also." Second, from "In terms of what is time discussed?" downwards is the second clause, inquiring into the preceding sentence and explaining the sequence of faculties and so forth below. Third, from "How are they sequential?" downwards inquires into the second above and explains the similarity of faculties and so forth below. Fourth, from "Similar to what?" downwards inquires into the third above and explains the two words "faith and so forth" below. Fifth, from "Like past habituation..." downwards reveals the meaning of the similarity and sequence above. Only between the initial faculties and understandings do these two possess sequence and similarity in relation to one another; since dispositions and inclinations merely clarify the meaning of similarity, their sequence is self-evident and hence omitted. Regarding the commentary's statement from "If the similar is not yet mature..." downwards: third, it analogously explains the three groups. The three groups are also generated from the four above; therefore it was stated above that the three groups are the general.