大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 74.13

74.13

疏「若一乘」下，二依一乘真實答。於中有四：一正明實義。二「然非現在之現在」下，通妨。謂有問云：若爾，何名見未來耶？答意可知。三「此有若是」下，立理重難。縱其性有緣有，二俱有過。四「若今時看」下、以理會通，謂不向今時看未。若向今時看未，此未即現在，未來如何得有？若逐下向未來看未，未是未之現在矣，故異於今。

As for the commentary's "If according to the ekayāna" and below, this is the second part, answering according to the true reality of the ekayāna. Within this there are four: First, directly clarifying the real meaning. Second, from "However, it is not the present of the present" onward, resolving an objection. That is, someone asks: "If so, why is it called seeing the future?" The intent of the answer is understandable. Third, from "If this existence is" onward, establishing the principle and challenging again: Conceding that it exists essentially or exists through conditions, both have faults. Fourth, from "If looking from the present time" onward, harmonising through principle: that is, not looking at the future toward the present time. If looking at the future toward the present time, this future is just the present; how could the future exist? If pursuing downward toward the future to look at the future, the future is the present of the future, hence different from the present.