大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 77.34

77.34

疏「如文殊般若中辯」，〈光明覺品〉已引。疏「別中十句多同〈出現〉身之十相」者，彼之十相即是十身。一普入成益相，即威勢身。二無心普應相，即是化身，故云種族調善。三平等隨應，即菩提身，由菩薩智無所住故，平等隨應。四無著無礙，即智身。五周遍十方，即是法身，故云一性。六嚴剎益生，即福德身。七無生潛益，即相好莊嚴身。八嚴好滿願，即是願身，願力周法界，恒轉妙法輪故。九窮盡後際，即力持身故。彼經中以醫王延壽為喻，喻佛雖涅槃而不失利樂。十圓迴等住，即意生身，故云心念則現。以彼十相十身，對今經文一無差異，其有難者隨句已釋。若依彼次，此一即彼三，二即彼七，三即彼四，四即彼二，五即彼一，六即彼九，七即彼五，八即彼十，九即彼八，十即彼六。但彼文廣，理無二也。疏「後一意生等身淨」者，由言解脫自在，故云意生身。言等身者，等取願身、化身等也。

Regarding the Commentary's statement "as explained in the Mañjuśrī-prajñā": this was already cited in the "Chapter on Awakening through Light."

Regarding the Commentary's statement "the ten phrases in the specific treatment largely correspond to the ten marks of the body in the [Chapter on] Manifestation": those ten marks are precisely the ten bodies:
1. The mark of universally entering to effect benefit is the body of majestic power.
2. The mark of universally responding without deliberate thought is the transformation body; hence it is said that its lineage is well-attuned.
3. Impartially responding in accordance [with beings] is the bodhi body; because the bodhisattva's wisdom has no fixed abode, it impartially responds in accordance.
4. Being unattached and unhindered is the wisdom body.
5. Pervading the ten directions is the dharmakāya; hence it is said to have a single nature.
6. Adorning lands to benefit sentient beings is the body of merit.
7. Unproduced and covertly benefiting is the body adorned with marks and signs.
8. Adorned and excellent, fulfilling wishes is the vow body; because the vow-power encompasses the dharmadhātu, constantly turning the wondrous Dharma wheel.
9. Exhausting the future limit is the body of sustaining power; hence in that sūtra, the king of physicians prolonging life is used as a metaphor, illustrating that although the Buddha enters nirvāṇa, he does not forfeit benefit and joy.
10. Perfect, revolving, and abiding equally is the mind-made body (manomayakāya); hence it is said that it manifests whenever the mind thinks of it.

Comparing those ten marks and ten bodies to the present sūtra text, there is not the slightest discrepancy. Where there are difficult points, they have already been explained along with each phrase. If based on that sequence: this first corresponds to that third; the second to that seventh; the third to that fourth; the fourth to that second; the fifth to that first; the sixth to that ninth; the seventh to that fifth; the eighth to that tenth; the ninth to that eighth; and the tenth to that sixth. Only that text is broad, but in principle they are not two.

Regarding the Commentary's statement "the final one: the purity of the mind-made and other bodies": because it speaks of liberation and mastery, it says "mind-made body." The statement "and other bodies" includes by extension the vow body, transformation body, and so on.