大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 79.64

79.64

疏「彼無垢識而得說耶」下，第三遮救。二句疏文，遮其兩救。上句，恐彼救云：淨相難說，故不言之。故今遮云：彼《莊嚴經》何得說有無漏識耶？豈非是淨？下句，恐彼救云：經言叵得，意在於染。故亦遮云：經何不言染不可得？

Regarding the commentary's statement, "Could that untainted consciousness be spoken of?" downward: this is the third, blocking counter-defenses. The two sentences of the commentary block two counter-defenses. The first sentence addresses the fear that they might defend themselves by saying: "The marks of the pure are difficult to express, and therefore it is not mentioned." Hence it now blocks this by saying: "In that Alaṃkārasūtra, how could it speak of the existence of untainted consciousness? Is that not pure?" The second sentence addresses the fear that they might defend themselves by saying: "When the sūtra says 'unapprehensible,' its intent lies in the defiled." Hence it also blocks this by saying: "Why does the sūtra not say that the defiled is unapprehensible?"