大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 79.67

79.67

疏「若二義雙取」下，第二合破二宗，成四謗故。此亦遮救。謂有救云：上之二宗偏取不可，合豈過耶？故云：合則相違。以其定謂有無，非即有之無、即無之有故。若爾，互泯雙非可乎？故答云：寧逃戲論？以無詮當故。

Regarding the commentary's statement from "If both meanings are taken together" downward: this is the second part, refuting both schools jointly, as this constitutes the four extremes of error. This also blocks counter-defenses. That is, someone might defend by saying: "If adhering one-sidedly to either of the above two schools is unacceptable, how could combining them be faulty?" Hence it says: "Combining them results in contradiction." This is because they determinately assert existence and nonexistence, rather than nonexistence being identical to existence, and existence being identical to nonexistence. If so, would mutually negating both and asserting neither be acceptable? Hence it answers: "How could one escape prapañca?" This is because there would be nothing corresponding to what is expressed.