大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 8.18

8.18

疏「然涅槃依於理性」下，第二辯其差當。《涅槃》明有心作佛，有心未必有行，既皆作佛，明約理性，何以趣寂？趣寂定不成佛，有心定當作佛，豈得相成？

The Commentary states: "However, the Nirvāṇa relies on the nature of principle..." and below; this is the second part, discerning its validity. The Nirvāṇa explains that having a mind leads to buddhahood; having a mind does not necessarily mean having practice. Since all attain buddhahood, it is clearly explained with respect to the nature of principle. Why, then, speak of entering quiescence? Those who enter quiescence definitely do not attain buddhahood, while those with a mind definitely will attain buddhahood—how could [these two views] complement each other?