大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 81.56

81.56

疏「中觀云」下，二引證，即是第二論〈觀合品〉，具云「異因異有異，異離異無異，若法所因出，是法不異因。」〈十通品〉已引，此中但取果不異因之一義耳。如因梁椽以成於舍，梁椽若壞則舍立壞，果不異因故。若果不異因，則過去為果則應名現未，現未即是過去因故。

Regarding the commentary's citation, "The Madhyamaka says" downward, this is the second, citing evidence; that is, the "Examination of Combination Chapter" of the second treatise, which fully states: "Difference is different because of a distinct cause; / separated from difference, there is no difference. / If the dharma from which something arises is that, / this dharma is not different from its cause." This was already cited in the "Chapter on the Ten Superknowledges"; here it merely takes the single meaning that the effect is not different from the cause. Just as a house is formed depending on beams and rafters, if the beams and rafters are ruined, the house is immediately ruined, because the effect is not different from the cause. If the effect is not different from the cause, then when the past is the effect, it should be called the present and future, because the present and future are the causes of the past.