大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 34.41

34.41

Regarding the Commentary's statement starting with "Concerning the identity of fruits": fourth, it specifically explains the identity of the fruits, because it is difficult to see. Within this there are two parts: first, the direct explanation; later, from "therefore the Cheng weishi [lun]" onward, it cites proof, which is the tenth fascicle of that treatise. Within this, regarding the four bodies and lands, the text is divided into three: first, it explains the realized svābhāvikakāya and its land; since they are identically what is realized, it clarifies that their essence is identical, like the space within a single room. Second, self-enjoyment, like the light of a thousand lamps jointly illuminating the interior of a room. Third, the other two bodies and lands, namely the other-enjoyment and the transformation [bodies and lands]; these precisely prove what came before, and are also called identical by similarity, yet are seen as different in accordance with faculties. The Commentary's text has two parts: first, the setting forth; second, the explanation. Now, the first: concerning being seen as different in accordance with faculties, as for "having shared and unshared," being shared makes for difference, hence it is called "shared"; it is not the meaning of identity. "Unshared" is due to differences in transformation; both of the above two are different. However, shared and unshared are also called identical by similarity. Causing them to individually see the differences between shared and unshared is precisely being seen as different in accordance with faculties.