大般涅槃經集解 59.26

59.26

案僧亮曰：外道救義，但救多我之切也。我有遍常，不遍常法，非法不遍也。常我雖遍，然行法則智、行非法則愚，不得無差也。

Sengliang comments: "The non-Buddhists defend their thesis, but only defend the critical point of many selves. The self possesses ubiquity and permanence; not-pervading is the permanent dharma, while non-dharma does not pervade. Although the permanent self is ubiquitous, when one practices dharma one is wise, and when one practices non-dharma one is foolish; thus they cannot be without differences."